On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:45 PM Anthonin Bonnefoy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:39 AM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since Tomas added GetXLogInsertEndRecPtr() in commit b1f14c96720, > > I updated the patch to use it. Patch attached. > > Barring any objections, I will commit it. > > > > - XLogFlush(GetXLogWriteRecPtr()); > > + XLogFlush(GetXLogInsertEndRecPtr()); > > Thanks for the updated patch! I've run my test script against the > patch and there's no more "xlog flush request xxx is not satisfied" > errors reported.
Thanks for the test! I've pushed the patch. > > I excluded the above change from the patch because it seems like a separate > > issue. I also wonder whether this code could cause an error in XLogFlush() > > even when GetXLogWriteRecPtr() is used. > > Ha right, I've mixed Insert and Write and thought that > FinishSyncWorker was also doing a XlogFlush(GetXLogInsertRecPtr()) > when writing the patch. If I try to trigger the partial record issue, > GetXLogWriteRecPtr() points at the end of the WAL page containing the > beginning of the FPI_FOR_HINT, there's no attempt to flush in the > future. So FinishSyncWorker doesn't seem impacted by the issue. Understood. Thanks for the investigation! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
