> On Mar 17, 2026, at 13:29, Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As is_log_level_output() returns false against FATAL_CLIENT_ONLY, so that >> FATAL_CLIENT_ONLY should not reach send_message_to_server_log(). Should we >> assert edata->elevel != FATAL_CLIENT_ONLY? > > Andrey asked the same question upthread, this mirrors how > WARNING_CLIENT_ONLY is implemented. > Do you mean that we do the same as WARNING_CLIENT_ONLY in this patch, and use a separate patch to fix them together? Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Zsolt Parragi
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Andrey Borodin
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Zsolt Parragi
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Andrey Borodin
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Zsolt Parragi
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Chao Li
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Zsolt Parragi
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Chao Li
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Zsolt Parragi
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
- Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging Jacob Champion
