On 16.03.26 17:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 8:39 PM zengman <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

The commit 2f094e7ac691abc9d2fe0f4dcf0feac4a6ce1d9c delivers an excellent 
feature, and the file `rewriteGraphTable.c` was introduced as part of this 
commit.
I've noticed that this code file could benefit from some tidying up, so please 
review the diff file attached below.
This diff only includes **basic cleanup** of `rewriteGraphTable.c` – it’s just 
a simple pass,
and there may be other minor omissions that haven’t been addressed yet.

Hi Man,
Thanks for the patch. I reviewed the cleanup you propose. Most of the
changes look good to me, except the changes related to pstate. We have
both patterns in the code, one which uses free_parsestate() explicitly
and another that doesn't. In this case, we don't set
p_target_relation, and we don't touch p_next_resno. So the only thing
that free_parsestate() does it to free pstate, which will taken care
of by the memory context management. So not needed. Any other reason
you want to call free_parsestate() explicitly?

Attached patch has changes other that pstate related changes.

committed this



Reply via email to