On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 22:00, Tender Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > David Rowley <[email protected]> 于2026年3月25日周三 10:09写道： > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 13:31, David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was experimenting with a less risky fix by having the datum_image > > functions force the sign-extended representation of the Datum before > > hashing or comparing. > > > > Attached is a quick PoC of what that would look like. It does fix the > > reported problem. But it is a hack and doesn't fix the root cause of > > the issue. > > > > Despite the hackiness, I feel this might be better than the > > whack-a-mole approach of just fixing incorrect usages of the > > PG_RETURN_* macros as and when we find them. > > No objection from me. > It seems no users have complained about hash_numberic(), and except > for this reported issue, no internal errors have been reported due to > hash_numberic().
I cleaned that method up and pushed it. Thanks for the report. David
