On 01/04/2026 11:53, Adam Lee wrote:
Hi hackers,
I ran into this while working on recovery pre-check logic that relies on
pg_controldata to verify whether replay has reached a specific restore point.
Reproducer:
```
-- on primary:
CHECKPOINT;
SELECT pg_create_restore_point('test_rp');
-- recover with:
-- recovery_target_name = 'test_rp'
-- recovery_target_action = 'shutdown'
-- after recovery shuts down:
pg_controldata shows minRecoveryPoint 104 bytes behind
pg_create_restore_point's return value (104 bytes = one
RESTORE_POINT WAL record).
```
My RCA:
When recovery_target_action=shutdown triggers, the checkpointer performs a
shutdown restartpoint via CreateRestartPoint(). If a CHECKPOINT record was
replayed shortly before the recovery target, CreateRestartPoint advances
minRecoveryPoint to the end of that CHECKPOINT record.
However, any no-op records replayed after the CHECKPOINT (such as
RESTORE_POINT) do not dirty pages, so the lazy minRecoveryPoint update that
normally happens during page flushes never fires for them. As a result,
minRecoveryPoint in pg_control ends up behind the actual replay position.
Hmm, what exactly does minRecoveryPoint mean? The current behavior is
correct in the sense that if you restarted recovery, you could still
stop the recovery at the earlier LSN that's the minRecoveryPoint in the
control file, and the system would be consistent. I agree it feels
pretty weird though, it would seem natural to advance minRecoveryPoint
to the last replayed record on a restartpoint.
My Fix:
The attached patch fixes this by reading the current replay position from
shared memory after advancing minRecoveryPoint to the checkpoint end, and
advancing further if replay has progressed past it. This is safe because
CheckPointGuts() has already flushed all dirty buffers and the startup process
has exited, so replayEndRecPtr is stable and all pages are on disk.
We have this comment earlier in CreateRestartPoint():
* We don't explicitly advance minRecoveryPoint when we do create a
* restartpoint. It's assumed that flushing the buffers will do that as
a
* side-effect.
That assumption is not quite right, then.
Perhaps we should simply call UpdateMinRecoveryPoint()? That would cause
the control file to be flushed twice though, so it's a little
inefficient, but maybe that's fine.
If we go with your patch, does it make this existing logic below obsolete?
if (ControlFile->state == DB_IN_ARCHIVE_RECOVERY)
{
if (ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint <
lastCheckPointEndPtr)
{
ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint =
lastCheckPointEndPtr;
ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI =
lastCheckPoint.ThisTimeLineID;
/* update local copy */
LocalMinRecoveryPoint =
ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint;
LocalMinRecoveryPointTLI =
ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI;
}
if (flags & CHECKPOINT_IS_SHUTDOWN)
ControlFile->state = DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY;
}
- Heikki
