> > Well, autoanalyze only runs in this case if autovacuum is disabled via the > > table's autovacuum_enabled reloption and _not_ disabled via the autovacuum > > or track_counts GUCs. I think this is pretty clearly unintentional, as I > > can find no mention in the code, archives, or docs. And unless I'm missing > > something, it's completely unnecessary. So IMHO we should just remove it. > > +1. I think it might be better to mention this in the documentation to > make the behavior explicit. What do you think about stating that an > anti-wraparound autovacuum does not perform an ANALYZE, like in the > attached patch?
+1 to the additional documentation. a small nit: We can just say "skipped" and not "still skipped". -- Sami
