On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 5:16 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Still, the current phrasing seems a bit too strong to me. Strictly speaking, > the memory is already inherited at fork time, so this is not making access > impossible in an absolute sense. What this patch really does is remove the > inherited PostmasterContext, so the child no longer retains that > postmaster-private data through that context. > > Maybe we could phrase in some way like: "so that it no longer retains access > to postmaster-private data through PostmasterContext”.
Thanks for the review! I've pushed the patch. Per your and Tiancheng's suggestions, I just used "prevent unintended use" in the commit message. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
