+uint64 max_ticks_no_overflow = 0;

Could this be int64? It is based on PG_INT64_MAX, and it's only
practical use is with a cast to int64.

> This allows the direct use of the Time-Stamp Counter (TSC) value retrieved
> from the CPU using RDTSC/RDTSC instructions,

Typo in commit message for 0003: RDTSC/RDTSC

+ else
+ printf(_("TSC clock source is not usable. Likely unable to determine
TSC frequency. are you running in an unsupported virtualized
environment?.\n"));
+}

Typo: are, ?.


-/* TSC specific logic */
+/* Hardware clock specific logic (x86 TSC / AArch64 CNTVCT) */

Shouldn't this ARM patch also update the documentation?


Reply via email to