Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> On 06.04.26 23:31, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BF member ayu is failing said test:
>> ...
>> I don't know if it's worth catering to this extremely old
>> clang version ...

> But AFAICT, clang 5 and older are completely broken in this regard, 
> because they react to the presence of [[clang::fallthrough]] with a 
> syntax error ("error: expected expression").  Not even clang's own 
> example code[0] works.

Hah, so we'd make it worse not better by adding
[[clang::fallthrough]].  Let's leave well enough alone then.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to