On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 06:01:08AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > That looks to work, thanks! But I was wondering if this new version is not > introducing a new race: the injection point is not local anymore so it could > be > that another process reach the new injection point. That said, even if this is > the case I think we're ok since s2 is using "query_until" so we could say that > "at least" s2 reached the injection point. The new version does not ensure > that > "only" s2 reached the injection point but I think that's safe.
Yes, the lookups based on pg_stat_activity should be enough, I hope. From what I can see, the buildfarm is silent this morning for this test, as much as [1] in the CI, so I'd like to think that we are done here. Again, I'm hoping so. [1]: https://cfbot.cputube.org/highlights/all.html -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
