Re: Small and unlikely overflow hazard in bms_next_member()

[David Rowley]

On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 at 12:24, Chao Li <li.evan.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just tried test_bms_next3 on my MacBook, looks like patched bms_prev_member 
> is much faster there. I ran about 10 times, the results were consistent.

Thanks. I saw similar results.

David