Paul A Jungwirth <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 7:33 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> But speaking of infinite loops, should this one contain a
>> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call? It's hard to conceive of a case where
>> the value would be broken down finely enough for that to be a
>> problem, but ...
> A rangetype could only loop 0-2 times; a multirange 0-1. So I don't
> think we need it. Eventually user-defined types could loop more, but a
> design that inserts many records every time you change something seems
> like a bad idea. Maybe I would add it anyway just out of caution, but
> I suspect it's excessive.
Fair enough. It's quite likely that we'd hit at least one CFI down
inside the insertion anyway.
regards, tom lane
