On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 12:18 PM Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, I think changing it to a temp table is the easiest fix. We could > also do autovacuum_enabled=false, I think, but making it a temp table > seems cleanest. > > I wonder if we should move the EXPLAIN test above the results queries, > then throw in a vacuum in between some of them so we exercise btree > gist as a bitmap heap scan and as an index only scan. It could provide > a little bit more coverage? Or maybe that isn't actually extra > coverage. I'm not sure.
I kept it simple and just committed making it a temp table in 62407d26b7c - Melanie
