Hi,

Thanks for taking a look at the patch.

On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 at 12:59, jian he <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 5:37 PM Ayush Tiwari
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Reattaching patch with right format for cfbot.
> >
>
> I am not so sure these errhint are redundant, maybe the errdeatil is
> redundant.
> I am ok with:
> + errmsg("cannot merge non-adjacent partitions \"%s\" and \"%s\"",
>     second_name->relname, first_name->relname),
> + errhint("ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS requires the partition
> bounds to be adjacent."),
>

I see your point, but I'd lean toward keeping errdetail over errhint
here. The errdetail tells the user *which* specific bounds don't match
("lower bound of partition B is not equal to upper bound of partition
A"), which is useful when merging 3+ partitions — the user can identify
the exact problem pair. The errhint ("bounds must be adjacent") mostly
restates what the errmsg ("non-adjacent") already says.

That said, I don't feel strongly about it. I could also keep both
(errdetail + errhint) if you think that's better, though it does get
verbose. What do you think?


>
> in partition_split.sql, partition_merge.sql,
> I agree with that.sql file has "-- ERROR:" comments that are
> exact copies of the error message, is not great. But you suddenly delete
> all
> these comments seems not good.
>
> We can add the `-- ERROR` comment suffix, as used in
> contrib/file_fdw/sql/file_fdw.sql
> or group them and add a comment like ``-- none of the following should
> be accepted``,
> as seen in src/test/regress/sql/arrays.sql.
>

Good point, removing them all without replacement does make the tests
harder to skim. I'll update v3 to use short markers like "-- should
fail" instead of the exact error text, similar to what file_fdw.sql
does. That way there's still a visual signal that the statement is
expected to error, without the maintenance burden of duplicating the
exact message.

Regards,
Ayush

Reply via email to