On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 9:27 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 12:16 PM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > PSA v4, now combined as Vignesh suggested, and with the extra space also > > fixed. > > > > I would like to explicitly mention in the commit message that "Tag for > included publications was a pre-existing behavior but it is better to > change it for making it consistent with excluded publications tag. So, > how about a commit message as follows: "psql: Improve describe footer > titles for publications. > > The psql describe (`\d`) footer titles were previously unintuitive > when listing publications that included or excluded specific tables. > Even though the tag for included publications was pre-existing, it is > better to update it to "Included in publications:" to match the > phrasing of the "Excluded from publications:" tag. > > Footer titles for sequence and schema descriptions have been updated > similarly to maintain consistency." > > --
OK, but the order what happened was a bit different. 1/ Firstly, it was only the "Except publications:" footer for \d that was unintuitive. So that was updated to "Excluded from publications:". 2/ The pre-existing "Publications:" was intuitive as-is, but it was updated to better match wording of 1. 3/ Then footer titles for sequence/schema were updated same So maybe reword it slightly something like below: SUGGESTION The psql describe (`\d`) footer title was previously unintuitive when listing publications that excluded specific tables. This has been fixed to say "Excluded from publications:". The pre-existing footer title for listing publications that include specific tables has also been modified to to better match that phrasing. Now it says "Included in publications:". Footer titles for sequence and schema descriptions have been updated similarly to maintain consistency. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
