On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 5:18 PM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 03:32:24PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote: > > I fed the logical replication online documentation into my favourite > > AI tool to help me come up with the following patch that fixes many > > minor issues (e.g., spelling, grammar, inconsistencies, vagueness, > > etc.). > > It is a mixed bag of changes. Some of the suggestions are correct > grammar fixes, some make things somewhat worse, some are irrelevant > (like the s/won't/will not/ or the s/please//). > > - When logical replication of a table typically starts, PostgreSQL takes > - a snapshot of the table's data on the publisher database and copies it > + Logical replication of a table typically starts by PostgreSQL taking > + a snapshot of the table's data on the publisher database and copying it > to the subscriber. Once complete, changes on the publisher since the > > This new sentence makes less sense here. And there's nothing bad with > the original. > > Some of these mistakes are older than HEAD, and are user-visible, so > backpatched the most relevant ones. > > Thanks.
Hi Michael, Thanks for pushing! (My opinion differs about some of the rejected ones, but I am not going to debate about them.) ====== Kind Regards Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
