On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, at 4:37 AM, Dilip Kumar wrote: > > Yeah we may, but I feel what we have now looks more readable. > My suggestion is that this function should be available in a central place. That's not the only place that could use qualified schema and relation. If you search for get_namespace_name_or_temp you will notice that this code path is repeated in other parts of the code too (see ruleutils.c). It would be good if we can have a common path for it. Maybe the signature has to be get_qualified_relname(Oid) to accommodate other cases. -- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
- Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication error mess... shveta malik
- Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication error... Peter Smith
- Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication e... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names in publicati... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names in publi... shveta malik
- Re: Include schema-qualified names in ... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... shveta malik
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... vignesh C
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Euler Taveira
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... shveta malik
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Amit Kapila
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... shveta malik
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Dilip Kumar
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Amit Kapila
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Euler Taveira
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... Amit Kapila
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... vignesh C
- Re: Include schema-qualified names... shveta malik
