Hi,
On Fri, 8 May 2026 at 05:46, Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 7:12 PM Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Attached patch fixes both issues. > > I plan to push and back-patch this shortly, as the code freeze for the > stable branches is just around the corner. > > - Richard > > I reviewed the patch and it looks good to me. The added opfamily and collation checks seem consistent with the uniqueness proof used in relation_has_unique_index_for(), and the tests cover both reported wrong-result cases. Applied the patch, ran tests, they passed. Regards, Ayush
