On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 2:51 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 12:00 PM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I had earlier suggested a timestamp column (pt 3 at [1]) to record > > conflict-occurence time (mainly 'conflict_logged_at' column) in CLT > > but the idea was kept on hold awaiting more feedback. Now we can > > revisit this. > > > > I feel 'conflict_logged_at' could be more beneficial because, going > > forward (based on feedback), we may range-partition this table on that > > field which may form as basis of historical data purge. I also > > suggested this in [2] (see 'That said, irrespective of what we > > decide') . Such a field could be basis of purging mechanism. > > > > Fair enough. We can extend the table with this field after more > discussion, so it will be better to pick up this discussion once the > base feature is committed. >
Okay. Works for me. thanks Shveta
