On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 2:43 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still a big +1 to the original proposal in this thread, and don't think > it would be incompatible with happy eyeballs. Although I would think the > latter would be quite wasteful, as we are not simply checking for a response, > but doing a whole connect/authenticate/get-status dance.
Just to make it clear, this is the opposite of what I'm arguing for. Happy Eyeballs implementations should not couple to application-level concerns, and we should not have to open up a bazillion concurrent connections just to find the single read/write leader. --Jacob
