Hi, On 2026-05-05 13:23:12 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > Agreed. I did this to match up with the ICU API a bit better, but if > it's interfering with useful tools, then the special cases aren't worth > it.
> Patch attached. Thanks! > It causes a bit of churn, so one disadvantage is that it will complicate > future backports in this area. I think it's worth the gain in instrument-ability. I also suspect it's good for runtime performance, adding all those branches can't be particularly good. Greetings, Andres Freund
