On Thu, 14 May 2026 at 14:48, Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > > While reviewing the patches, I realized that it would be better to use > pg_atomic_write_membarrier_u32() instead of pg_atomic_write_u32() + > pg_memory_barrier() where available. I've updated the patch for master > and 18, and slightly commit messages.
LGTM, thanks for getting this fixed! Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent Databricks
