On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 20:46 +0000, Tristan Partin wrote: > I would say proceed as you see fit. I guess I am generally of the > opinion that additional testing is generally always better, but I > don't > want to push for something if others don't see the same value. I'd be > happy to provide a patch for the test in a subsequent discussion if > that > is a good middle ground?
Yes, sounds good.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
