Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
> + property graph element label | | | e of e of
> create_property_graph_tests.gt
> + property graph element label | | | v1 of v1 of
> create_property_graph_tests.gt
> + property graph element label | | | v2 of v2 of
> create_property_graph_tests.gt
> [...]
> + property graph label property | | | c of e of e of
> create_property_graph_tests.gt
> + property graph label property | | | k1 of e of e of
> create_property_graph_tests.gt
> + property graph label property | | | k2 of e of e of
> create_property_graph_tests.gt
> FWIW, I still find these descriptions written as of "$object of
> $object of..", or worse the "$object1 of $object2 of $object2 of..",
> really hard to parse, and make some sense out of them. Am I the only
> one?
No. At the very least, these messages violate our style guidelines [1]:
Type of the Object
When citing the name of an object, state what kind of object it is.
Rationale: Otherwise no one will know what “foo.bar.baz” refers to.
I'm not sure whether adding that would be sufficient to make these
intelligible, but surely it would help. I think your first example
would come out like
label e of property(?) e of property graph create_property_graph_tests.gt
regards, tom lane
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/error-style-guide.html#ERROR-STYLE-GUIDE-OBJECT-TYPE
