On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 7:32 AM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 10:54 PM Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2026-May-21, Peter Smith wrote: > > > > > The new tests in patch v5 look good to me. > > > > So do we want to consider this a backpatchable bugfix, or just a > > new-feature-ish quality of life improvement? If the former, then we > > should probably backpatch it; otherwise we would normally wait until > > pg20 opens. Though to be honest I would also consider this as > > borderline okay to include in pg19 for beta2 -- especially considering > > that the output in 19 is already changed by the EXCEPT TABLE listing > > additions. > > > > Given that it applies to servers back to 15, that means that in the > > situation where it applies, pg19's psql (or pg20's) output would be > > different than earlier ones given identical database state. I'm not > > sure that would be really great. > > > > What do others think? > > FWIW, when I wrote this, in my mind I considered it more like the > "quality of life improvement" because it is mostly about not > displaying redundant information, rather than fixing any major bug. >
+1. I also feel this should be considered as an improvement for PG20. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
