Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > The next question is whether or not to back-patch this. Although this > was reported as a bug, my inclination is to apply this to HEAD only, > based on the lack of prior complaints. That also matches our decision > for other similar patches, e.g., 7d9a4737c2.
+1 for no back-patch. Even though the new results are hopefully more accurate, they're still different from before, and that might cause issues for somebody if it happens in a stable branch. regards, tom lane