> On Jun 23, 2026, at 10:11, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While testing "[76e514ebb] Add pg_get_role_ddl() function" as well as the 
> other pg_get_xxx_ddl() functions, I noticed that their pg_proc.dat 
> definitions use "text" rather than "_text" for variadic argument types. For 
> example:
> ```
> { oid => '6501', descr => 'get DDL to recreate a role',
> proname => 'pg_get_role_ddl', prorows => '10', provariadic => 'text',
> proisstrict => 'f', proretset => 't', provolatile => 's',
> pronargdefaults => '1', prorettype => 'text', proargtypes => 'regrole text',
> proallargtypes => '{regrole,text}', proargmodes => '{i,v}',
> proargdefaults => '{NULL}', prosrc => 'pg_get_role_ddl' },
> ```
> 
> I spotted this problem some time ago, but I wasn’t sure whether it was a real 
> issue worth fixing. When I saw a new patch [1] for pg_get_table_ddl() that 
> had the same problem, I asked about it there. Akshay confirmed the problem 
> and pointed me to the opr_sanity check. Thank you very much, Akshay.
> 
> Then I checked why the sanity check didn’t report the issue. I found that the 
> check used != for the comparison. When the final argument type is not an 
> array type, the subquery returns NULL, and NULL != provariadic evaluates to 
> NULL rather than true. I fixed the check to use IS DISTINCT FROM. After that, 
> it reported the mismatch:
> ```
> % make -C src/test/regress check-tests TESTS='test_setup opr_sanity'
> # +++ regress check in src/test/regress +++
> # initializing database system by copying initdb template
> # using temp instance on port 58928 with PID 36865
> ok 1         - test_setup                                243 ms
> # diff -U3 
> /Users/chaol/Documents/code/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out
>  
> /Users/chaol/Documents/code/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/opr_sanity.out
> # --- 
> /Users/chaol/Documents/code/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out
>    2026-06-23 07:58:52
> # +++ 
> /Users/chaol/Documents/code/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/opr_sanity.out
>     2026-06-23 07:59:41
> # @@ -488,9 +488,13 @@
> #                 FROM pg_type t
> #                 WHERE t.typarray = proargtypes[array_length(proargtypes, 
> 1)-1])
> #       END IS DISTINCT FROM provariadic;
> # - oid | provariadic | proargtypes
> # ------+-------------+-------------
> # -(0 rows)
> # +                  oid                  | provariadic |       proargtypes
> # 
> +---------------------------------------+-------------+--------------------------
> # + pg_get_role_ddl(regrole,text)         | text        | [0:1]={regrole,text}
> # + pg_get_tablespace_ddl(oid,text)       | text        | [0:1]={oid,text}
> # + pg_get_tablespace_ddl(name,text)      | text        | [0:1]={name,text}
> # + pg_get_database_ddl(regdatabase,text) | text        | 
> [0:1]={regdatabase,text}
> # +(4 rows)
> #
> #  -- Check that all and only those functions with a variadic type have
> #  -- a variadic argument.
> not ok 2     - opr_sanity                               8938 ms
> 1..2
> # 1 of 2 tests failed.
> ```
> 
> After updating pg_proc.dat to change those "text" entries to "_text", the 
> test passed.
> 
> See the attached patch for details.
> 
> [1] 
> https://postgr.es/m/canxolde_goxyyzs7gn3vujot+o1dwqzghid-twwvs0d8d5g...@mail.gmail.com
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Chao Li (Evan)
> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
> https://www.highgo.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 

Oops! Missed the attachment.

--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/




Attachment: v1-0001-Tighten-opr_sanity-check-for-variadic-functions.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to