Hi Arne, Thank you for the thorough and thoughtful response. As you suggested:
> "You can read more about our design rationale in chapter 8 in the > attached key_joins.pdf or online at https://keyjoin.org/#sec8. For an > understanding of the usefulness of the feature I suggest sections 7.2 > to 7.6 again in the key_joins.pdf or online at https://keyjoin.org/#sec7.2 ." I will read through these sections carefully and come back with further comments. I genuinely admire the ambition of bringing this to WG3. Pushing a Change Proposal to the SQL standard is no small undertaking, and I respect the effort behind it. I hope the Stockholm meeting goes well. On a personal note — I work on PostgreSQL upstream contributions myself, and I have long been interested in the SQL standard as a living document rather than a fixed reference. If I ever reach the point of wanting to raise a small question or propose a correction based on something I encounter in implementation work, would it be alright to reach out to you? Best regards, Henson
