On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 6:49 PM Feng Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Haibo,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> I agree that the SQL-callable pg_catalog.interval(interval, int4) path is the
> important case to cover here.  The v1 test was already exercising that direct
> call, but it used a DO block intentionally so that the regression test checks
> the SQLSTATE is invalid_parameter_value, rather than only matching the error
> message text.
>
> In v2, I kept that structure and updated the test comment to make this 
> clearer.
>
> Regards,
> Feng

Thank you for fixing this. v2 looks good to me.

Regards
Haibo


Reply via email to