On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 5:14 AM Jonathan Gonzalez V. <[email protected]> wrote: > These failure has already been discussed here[0], but this is a > patch on the code rather than add an exception.
Thanks for the patch! I'm not sure we should get on the treadmill of catering to lcov, when I look at the huge number of errors its 2.x line now throws for widely-used compilers and coding styles. (Right now my ignore_errors setting is up to six categories, I think. Which is unfortunate, but its signal-to-noise ratio is just not good right now. Just yesterday I had to patch out an error in 2.4 that was preventing me from running genhtml.) --Jacob
