Hi Kuroda-san, On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 12:48:53PM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: > Dear Bertrand, > > Good catch. Current code allows that old `sub` value is retained, so it sounds > reasonable fix even for me. > > BTW, the issue that GetSubscription() is called before the LockSharedObject() > looks > the existing issues even on REL_13_STABLE. So does it mean that there were no > cases that concurrent altering can be the unexpected state?
Yeah, but I think they would produce "tuple concurrently updated" error (due to CatalogTupleUpdate) so that invalid information could not be used. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
