bt_child_highkey_check() walks right along the child level following
btpo_next links, reading a page on each iteration, but its loop lacked a
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS().  Every other page-traversal loop in
verify_nbtree.c already has one.

The loop's existing checks do not guarantee a timely exit on a corrupt
index.  The in-loop cycle check only fires when a rightlink points back
through the block the walk started from, or to a page whose btpo_prev
points to itself, so a cycle further downstream can go undetected -- for
example a run of pages all flagged P_INCOMPLETE_SPLIT, which skips both
the high-key comparison and bt_downlink_missing_check() and so never
reaches an error.  Such an index, or simply a very long rightlink chain,
makes the walk effectively uninterruptible.  Since amcheck exists to be
run against possibly-corrupt indexes, make this walk respond to query
cancellation and shutdown requests like the sibling loops do.
---
v2: only the commit message changed -- v1's description of the in-loop
cycle check was imprecise.  The code (the one-line CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS)
is unchanged.

This is the same shape as commit 191dce109be ("contrib/amcheck: Add
heapam CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()"), which was backpatched.
bt_child_highkey_check() exists in all supported branches, so this looks
like a backpatch candidate as well.

 contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c b/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
index 3ef2d66f826..486bd7a87cc 100644
--- a/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
+++ b/contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
@@ -2191,6 +2191,8 @@ bt_child_highkey_check(BtreeCheckState *state,
        /* Move to the right on the child level */
        while (true)
        {
+               CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
+
                /*
                 * Did we traverse the whole tree level and this is check for 
pages to
                 * the right of rightmost downlink?
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)



Reply via email to