> On 20 Jul 2026, at 16:59, Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]> wrote: > > We're holding cleanup lock on posting tree root while > ginScanPostingTreeToDelete(), not ginVacuumPostingTreeLeaves(). So, I > think yes, vacuum_delay_point() was deleted unintentionally. Yup, my recollection was wrong. ginVacuumPostingTreeLeaves() seems fine for a delay point. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GIN posting-tree leaf v... Paul Kim
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GIN posting-tr... Michael Paquier
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GIN posting-tr... Andrey Borodin
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GIN postin... Alexander Korotkov
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GIN po... Andrey Borodin
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() in GI... Alexander Korotkov
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() ... Paul Kim
- Re: Restore vacuum_delay_point() ... solai v
