On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:55 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > Rebased again. Patches that touch AC_CHECK_FUNCS are fun like that! > > Yeah, I've been burnt by that too recently. It occurs to me we could make > that at least a little less painful if we formatted the macro with one > line per function name: > > AC_CHECK_FUNCS([ > cbrt > clock_gettime > fdatasync > ... > wcstombs_l > ]) > > You'd still get conflicts in configure itself, of course, but that > doesn't require manual work to resolve -- just re-run autoconf.
+1, was about to suggest the same! -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
