Hi Jonathan, Thanks for the feedback.
> I checked on the coverage that this patch effectively improves, but > reviewing the report I notice that there's still some gap that can be > fixed by just adding another nested path like this: > > NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p1 COLUMNS (NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p10 COLUMNS (a int)) > NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p2 COLUMNS (NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p20 COLUMNS (b int)) Could you please clarify which lines of get_json_table_plan() this will cover which are not currently covered by patch v2? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
