> On 28 Jul 2026, at 12:01, Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote:
> While testing the online enabling of datachecksums, I discovered some > corner cases that can cause the background process to fail: > > * Invalid databases were only discovered when we tried to create > checksums for them, when we could instead discover them before > starting and fail early > * Databases dropped while the checksum process was running also > resulted in errors when it reached them and tried to build checksums > for them. In this case we could continue safely: the database was > dropped, there's no need to create checksums for it. > > I attached a patch that adds testcases for these and fixes the issues. Thanks, I've reviewed and tested your patch and intend to push it along with your other earlier patch shortly. -- Daniel Gustafsson
