> On 29 Jul 2026, at 18:25, Christophe Pettus <[email protected]> wrote:
> There was no particular reason besides lack of ambition that reindexdb and > clusterdb were not included. I've added them. > > Agreed with Daniel that a switch to control the new behavior makes sense (I > hadn't through about the status code issue). > > Revised patch attached (I've kept the patch name and Subject: consistent for > indexing purposes). It applies cleanly to 9fa2c1ebd17. I've only skimmed the patch thus far, but in general this seems like a good idea to me. -- Daniel Gustafsson
