> It'd be great to have 01 committed. It seems to me like a solid and low cost > solution for the torn pg_control (and missed backup lables). These are good > improvements for base backups.
I'd like to second this, if possible. It's not exactly a "glamorous" or critical issue, but this _does_ address a known issue re: torn pg_control if nothing else. Based on the conversation I saw here, it seems like there's no impetus so the patch is merely languishing, sans any lingering unaddressed criticism. Does it just need a committer to take ownership? -- Shaun Thomas Principal Software Engineer [email protected]
