> On 3 Aug 2026, at 13:16, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
FWIW, I like the idea proposed in this patch. > While looking at this patch, I'd like to have at least one valid test > using it. +1, a test using the new facility seems like a requirement for this. At some point we should probably consider documenting this module with a README, but that's for another patch. -- Daniel Gustafsson
