On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 4:50 PM Bharath Rupireddy <[email protected]> wrote: > I looked at both patches and they look good to me. pgindent is happy too.
Thanks for the review! > Just a quick question: is the documentation change considered > backpatchable when the source commit exists in older versions? I mean, > does it fall into the bug or inconsistency category that qualifies for > backpatching? Yes, I think 0002 is backpatchable. The issue is minor, but the documentation example is clearly inconsistent with the actual runtime message in branches where the source commit was backpatched. So I see this as a documentation bug fix rather than a cosmetic wording change. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
