Hi, > On Aug 11, 2026, at 13:35, John Naylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > That case doesn't make any sense to me -- can you construct a concrete > example and show what happens? In any case, it's more important here > to avoid false positives here than false negatives, especially given > the lack of field reports.
I initially thought that a custom variable-length type could use `array_in`/`array_out` while setting `ELEMENT` to `information_schema.sql_identifier`, without being its associated array. I had overlooked that user-defined types are not allowed to use `array_subscript_handler` directly. I agree that "AND e.typarray = t.oid" is a reasonable criterion here. LGTM. -- Best regards, Chengpeng Yan
