Hi,

On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 11:16 PM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I will drop both asserts and
> > keep a short comment explaining why the slot is still held here. The
> > existing AtEOSubXact_LargeObject() and AtEOSubXact_Files() don't check
> > the passed-in mySubid for invalid either.
> >
> > Does the following work for you?
> >
> > /*
> > * The aborting subxact is the one that acquired the slot, so the slot is
> > * still held and must be released. acquiredInSubId is set only when a slot
> > * is held and cleared when it is released, so a matching subxact id means
> > * the slot is ours.
> > */
> > ReplicationSlotRelease();
>
> I am okay with this comment. No 'MyReplicationSlot-null' check and no assert.

Thanks. Done so in the attached v12 patch. Please have a look.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment: v12-0001-Fix-replication-slot-leak-on-error-caught-in-a-s.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to