On 8/12/26 06:26, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > Hello Bryan, > > On 2026-Aug-10, Bryan Green wrote: > >> On 8/8/26 22:44, Bryan Green wrote: >> >>> In recovery/t/051_effective_wal_level.pl, standby3, standby4, and standby5 >>> are all init_from_backup()'d from 'my_backup', taken near the top of the >>> test, and started much later, after the primary has produced and recycled a >>> lot of WAL. Nothing keeps the WAL they need to reach consistency: no slot >>> covering it, no wal_keep_size, no archive. >> >> I have a use case that is not stock PG that this is related to. I'm >> withdrawing this. > > You have a use case for ... this test remaining borderline broken? I'm > wondering if you wanted to reply to some other thread. > > Thanks > Ah, you are correct. This was meant for another thread. Not withdrawn.
Thanks -- Bryan Green https://www.enterprisedb.com
