> On 27 Aug 2026, at 13:13, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 27 Aug 2026, at 07:17, Ewan Young <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 10:45 AM David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Attached v4 goes back to the explicit PG_INT32_MIN test: >> >> if (unlikely(n == PG_INT32_MIN)) >> n = PG_INT32_MAX; >> else >> n = -n; >> >> which applies cleanly to every supported branch (I checked REL_14 through >> REL_19 and master). The fix and the regression case are otherwise >> unchanged. > > I will prepare a backpatch all the way of this, and will ping the new thread > when done. (There is a lof work being done for shipping v19 so have a little > patience.) Finally got around to backpatching this to all supported branches. Thanks for the submission! -- Daniel Gustafsson
