Hi Henson, > As things stand, neither shape is giving a wrong answer. They just > take longer than they need to. That is an optimization we have not > done rather than a defect, and the current series is about defects, so > I would rather push the fix down the list. > > What do you think?
I agree. IMO stabilizing our code is the first priority. We can tackle the optimization later (probably after the first version of RPR gets committed). Also I think we should add this to the RPR restriction list to be fair for those who are willing to evaluate/review RPR patches. - Pushing down a run condition is disabled if DEFINE clause exists. - Replacing frame options by support functions is disabled if DEFINE clause exists. Regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
