Hi, On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 6:48 AM Sami Imseih <[email protected]> wrote: > > > One nit, please feel free to ignore it. VacuumUpdateCosts() prints > > yes/no for booleans, so on/off here could match that for consistency. > > AFAICS, there is no hard rule, and I am fine with it as is. > > Better to be consistent here. Attached is v3-, which also updates the test > output expected.
Thanks. v3 path looks good to me. -- Bharath Rupireddy Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
