[ This thread went quiet, but you reminded me of it in answering Pierre Forstmann's nearby question ]
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <[email protected]> writes: > Handling this part with your 0001 seems reasonable to me. I think we > should backpatch that one. Agreed, and it doesn't look like that got done, so I'll go do it now. > I'm not sure sure about the 0002 patch though. It builds in the > assumption that lcov is broken and that we're going to ignore these > warnings by default [forever]. Do we really want to bake those flags > into our build system? That bothers me too, mainly because I foresee a risk of the switches hiding genuine problems somewhere down the road. Also the switches Narek proposes don't match what I've found to be necessary on my own installation (so maybe there is a gcov version dependency here too?). For the moment I'm content to insert the --ignore-errors flags manually. The 0001 patch should at least reduce the noise level a bit. regards, tom lane
