> > > Committed (the "strict names" one). > Huzzah.
> Note that certain letters cannot be represented with the default PDF > font, so you'd get messages like > > [WARN] FOUserAgent - Glyph "ć" (0x107, cacute) not available in font > "Times-Roman". > [WARN] FOUserAgent - Glyph "ō" (0x14d, omacron) not available in font > "Times-Roman". > [WARN] FOUserAgent - Glyph "ł" (0x142, lslash) not available in font > "Times-Roman". > [WARN] FOUserAgent - Glyph "ś" (0x15b, sacute) not available in font > "Times-Roman". > [WARN] FOUserAgent - Glyph "ğ" (0x11f, gbreve) not available in font > "Times-Roman". > Those were either sourced from the commit message or from an email correction from a contributor, but I can make adjustments in the process to handle those next release. I have transcribed these names to ASCII to work around that. > Great! So now that we've wrapped that up, it may be worth discussing how to handle this in the future. The corpus of known-names and known-name preferences is something I plan to resuse next year, so things should be incrementally smoother. However, I did notice that the list went over 600 people this year, much higher than the 300-400 of recent years and far beyond the more modest lists of years past. I asked Mark Wong off list if he had any concerns about the size of the list, as he has a task that scales directly in proportion to the list size, and he expressed no concerns. So I'm inclined to not change anything for v20, but I would like to ask the community if they have any thoughts about the size of the list and/or the criteria for making the list.
