On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 7:27 PM Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 12:35 AM Jakub Wartak > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 1:18 AM Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > FWIW, I've needed this many times. Without the TCP information it's very > > > hard > > > to figure out why higher latency connections aren't keeping up - is it > > > packet > > > loss, it it too small network buffers on the sending/receiving side, is > > > it the > > > remote side not keeping up on the CPU level... > > > > Pretty much the same! > > +1 (and I wish I had this today, in particular...)
I also remind myself about this only when it's needed, but then it's always always already too late ;) > > Still , it is still PoC, and I'm not sure if the community is open to > > accept (or reject it). > > I think it's a useful concept. OK, so to just get some more rapid movement, I've changed my mind a little about this and I've marked in the commitfest as RwF, but I've fixed lots of bugs since last reviews over period of couple months and turned this into 3rd party extension (it's available under https://github.com/jakubwartakEDB/pg_stat_tcpinfo , supports BBR now and so on ). It seems that's a better vehicle for it. FWIW, we are already working as making available through the standard repos. -J.
