On 10/21/26 2:49 PM, Kirk Wolak wrote:
Having worked on the original patch, our goal was protecting the table data. The attempt to add DROP DATABASE "seemed" like it could come along for the ride,but it is clearly a different beast, for the reasons you describe.
+1I agree that leaving drop database for another patch is a good idea. Having it would be quite nice, bit it's indeed much harder than we anticipated, so I guess it's ok to postpone it.
Best, Jim
